0603206v1

related topics
{let, theorem, proof}
{bell, inequality, local}
{theory, mechanics, state}
{energy, state, states}
{observables, space, algebra}
{entanglement, phys, rev}
{group, space, representation}
{particle, mechanics, theory}

The Projective Line Over the Finite Quotient Ring GF(2)[$x$]/$< x^{3} - x>$ and Quantum Entanglement II. The Mermin "Magic" Square/Pentagram

Metod Saniga, Michel Planat, Milan Minarovjech

abstract: In 1993, Mermin (Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803--815) gave lucid and strikingly simple proofs of the Bell-Kochen-Specker (BKS) theorem in Hilbert spaces of dimensions four and eight by making use of what has since been referred to as the Mermin(-Peres) "magic square" and the Mermin pentagram, respectively. The former is a $3 \times 3$ array of nine observables commuting pairwise in each row and column and arranged so that their product properties contradict those of the assigned eigenvalues. The latter is a set of ten observables arranged in five groups of four lying along five edges of the pentagram and characterized by similar contradiction. An interesting one-to-one correspondence between the operators of the Mermin-Peres square and the points of the projective line over the product ring ${\rm GF}(2) \otimes \rm{GF}(2)$ is established. Under this mapping, the concept "mutually commuting" translates into "mutually distant" and the distinguishing character of the third column's observables has its counterpart in the distinguished properties of the coordinates of the corresponding points, whose entries are both either zero-divisors, or units. The ten operators of the Mermin pentagram answer to a specific subset of points of the line over GF(2)[$x$]/$$. The situation here is, however, more intricate as there are two different configurations that seem to serve equally well our purpose. The first one comprises the three distinguished points of the (sub)line over GF(2), their three "Jacobson" counterparts and the four points whose both coordinates are zero-divisors; the other features the neighbourhood of the point ($1, 0$) (or, equivalently, that of ($0, 1$)). Some other ring lines that might be relevant for BKS proofs in higher dimensions are also mentioned.

oai_identifier:
oai:arXiv.org:quant-ph/0603206
categories:
quant-ph math-ph math.MP
comments:
6 pages, 5 figures
doi:
10.1007/s11232-007-0049-5
arxiv_id:
quant-ph/0603206
journal_ref:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 151 (2007) 625-631
created:
2006-03-23

Full article ▸

related documents
9912114v2
0309057v1
0305031v1
0305005v1
0002058v1
9908050v1
0606077v1
0107111v2
0411027v1
0206169v2
0312164v1
0006061v1
9711062v1
0703061v1
0406072v1
0407179v1
0101030v3
0608156v1
0605132v1
0604123v2
0605213v2
0612033v1
0606242v3
0703193v2
0701198v1