|
| related topics |
| {state, algorithm, problem} |
| {qubit, qubits, gate} |
| {equation, function, exp} |
| {time, decoherence, evolution} |
| {states, state, optimal} |
| {operator, operators, space} |
| {let, theorem, proof} |
| {entanglement, phys, rev} |
| {energy, gaussian, time} |
| {time, wave, function} |
|
On the practicality of time-optimal two-qubit Hamiltonian simulation
Henry L. Haselgrove, Michael A. Nielsen, Tobias J. Osborne
abstract: What is the time-optimal way of using a set of control Hamiltonians to obtain
a desired interaction? Vidal, Hammerer and Cirac [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002)
237902] have obtained a set of powerful results characterizing the time-optimal
simulation of a two-qubit quantum gate using a fixed interaction Hamiltonian
and fast local control over the individual qubits. How practically useful are
these results? We prove that there are two-qubit Hamiltonians such that
time-optimal simulation requires infinitely many steps of evolution, each
infinitesimally small, and thus is physically impractical. A procedure is given
to determine which two-qubit Hamiltonians have this property, and we show that
almost all Hamiltonians do. Finally, we determine some bounds on the penalty
that must be paid in the simulation time if the number of steps is fixed at a
finite number, and show that the cost in simulation time is not too great.
- oai_identifier:
- oai:arXiv.org:quant-ph/0303070
- categories:
- quant-ph
- comments:
- 9 pages, 2 figures
- doi:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042303
- arxiv_id:
- quant-ph/0303070
- journal_ref:
- Phys. Rev. A 68, 042303 (2003)
- created:
- 2003-03-11
Full article ▸
|
|
| related documents |
| 0204044v5 |
| 0609125v1 |
| 9702039v4 |
| 0502014v2 |
| 0506244v2 |
| 0105071v2 |
| 0411194v2 |
| 0702007v2 |
| 0308016v1 |
| 0410145v2 |
| 0602135v1 |
| 0507036v3 |
| 0406092v1 |
| 0405157v2 |
| 0608039v4 |
| 0408134v1 |
| 0405063v2 |
| 0406167v2 |
| 0304174v1 |
| 0410181v1 |
| 0608211v2 |
| 0701227v2 |
| 0507119v1 |
| 0408048v1 |
| 0409007v2 |
|